Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | db3533c9-42ea-0ef4-2d70-8dfc016e02b5@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure ("kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/12/15 15:40, kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com wrote: > Yeah, remote-checking timeout will be enable even ifa local transaction is opened. > In my understanding, postgres cannot distinguish whether opening transactions > are using only local object or not. > My first idea was that turning on the timeout when GetFdwRoutineXXX functions > were called, What about starting the timeout in GetConnection(), instead? > I attached which implements that. v05_0004_add_tests.patch failed to be applied to the master. Could you rebase it? - This option is currently available only on systems that support the - non-standard <symbol>POLLRDHUP</symbol> extension to the - <symbol>poll</symbol> system call, including Linux. + This option relies on kernel events exposed by Linux, macOS, illumos + and the BSD family of operating systems, and is not currently available + on other systems. The above change is included in both v5-0003-Use-WL_SOCKET_CLOSED-for-client_connection_check_.patch and v05_0002_add_doc.patch.If it should be in the former patch, it should be removed from your patch v05_0002_add_doc.patch. There seems no user of UnregisterCheckingRemoteServersCallback(). So how about removing it? Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: