Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client |
Дата | |
Msg-id | db250a58-9aa2-86d2-b7bf-6ad64cd50142@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-01-15 Su 11:01, Tom Lane wrote: > Another thing I was just thinking about was not bothering to run > "diff" if the fixed dump strings are equal in-memory. You could > take that even further and not write out the fixed files at all, > but that seems like a bad idea for debuggability of the adjustment > subroutines. However, I don't see why we need to write an > empty diff file, nor parse it. Yeah, that makes sense. > One other question before I continue --- do the adjustment > subroutines need to worry about Windows newlines in the strings? > It's not clear to me whether Perl will automatically make "\n" > in a pattern match "\r\n", or whether it's not a problem because > something upstream will have stripped \r's. > > I don't think we need to worry about them, but I will have a closer look. Those replacement lines are very difficult to read. I think use of extended regexes and some multi-part replacements would help. I'll have a go at that tomorrow. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: