Re: Revisiting extract(epoch from timestamp)
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Revisiting extract(epoch from timestamp) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | daed4dd86f28fcfb42153e314477160f@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Revisiting extract(epoch from timestamp) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Revisiting extract(epoch from timestamp)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > so that we could mark it immutable. On the other hand, it's not > entirely apparent why people would need to create indexes on the epoch > value rather than just indexing the timestamp itself Well, it makes for smaller indexes if you don't really care about sub-second resolutions. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204091345 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk+DIJcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiLsQCgrA8Sxcljm+HPJ1jQY7l0u3UZ UTwAnjBGM7SstLCnihtRkxDJrMax2Ikl =Kjic -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: