Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dad0ad12-9a99-11ba-e308-d6ba0793f729@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-27 18:09, Tom Lane wrote: > My recollection of the discussion is that people argued that "postmaster" > might be taken to have something to do with an e-mail server, and > therefore we needed to stop using that name. The lack of either follow-on > complaints or follow-on action doesn't make me too well disposed to > what is essentially that same argument over again. The reason there was that the distinction was mostly useless and the different command-line option parsing was confusing. The name itself was confusing but not in conflict with anything. However, we do know that we are very bad at actually getting rid of deprecated things. How about we compromise in this thread and remove postmaster and leave everything else as is. ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: