Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10
От | Marina Polyakova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dac03dda4a743d293015b272eb1e6377@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17-01-2018 18:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> investigating the regression diffs, we found out that the error occurs >> when we pass int128 as not the first argument to the function (perhaps >> its value is replaced by the value of some address): >> ... >> Based on this, we modified the test program (see attached). Here is >> its >> output on Solaris 10 for different alignments requirements for int128 >> (on my machine where make check-world passes everything is OK) >> (ALIGNOF_PG_INT128_TYPE is 16 on Solaris 10): > > Excellent. This fails the same way on gcc 5.2.0 and 5.5.0? As Victor answered in [1]: > Unfortunately, we have only one Sparc machine and started our > investigation by upgrading GCC 5.2.0 to GCC 5.5.0, so it is hard to > downgrade and test with older GCC. >> Maybe some pass test from int128test2.c can be used to test __int128? > > Yeah, I can work with this. What I propose to do is use a somewhat > stripped-down version of this test as an AC_RUN_IFELSE test normally, > but if cross-compiling, fall back to just seeing if we can link. Thanks, I'll try to do this.. And Victor attached a stripped-down version of this in [1]. > Thanks for investigating! Thank you! :) [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180117181359.3a6cc06c%40fafnir.local.vm -- Marina Polyakova Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: