Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dab92c7f-ec55-4de8-b382-c4d025dbe02a@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure. (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-07-23 Tu 6:59 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
See <https://bitbucket.org/adunstan/rotfang-fdw/downloads/xid-wraparound-result.tar.bz2> The failure logs are from a run where both tests 1 and 2 failed.Thank you for sharing the logs. I think that the problem seems to match what Alexander Lakhin mentioned[1]. Probably we can fix such a race condition somehow but I'm not sure it's worth it as setting autovacuum = off and autovacuum_max_workers = 1 (or a low number) is an extremely rare case. I think it would be better to stabilize these tests. One idea is to turn the autovacuum GUC parameter on while setting autovacuum_enabled = off for each table. That way, we can ensure that autovacuum workers are launched. And I think it seems to align real use cases. Regards, [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/02373ec3-50c6-df5a-0d65-5b9b1c0c86d6%40gmail.com
OK, do you want to propose a patch?
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: