Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
От | Martin Goodson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | da1d1913-9302-b29a-2b45-b2d7f148e3d9@googlemail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 17/05/2017 20:11, Adrian Klaver wrote: > I thought you where working on VM you had access/rights to. > That is not the case? I have sudo access on the redhat box we're working on so technically I could do this, yup. But whilst our Unix team are happy for us to do whatever the heck we like within our own domain (so to speak - all the databases, tools we use, etc), they prefer to retain control over 'top level' system-admin stuff like disks, the contents of /lib, etc. I like to keep our sysadmins happy, so I'm going to leave /lib to them :) > Whoever does it needs to unlink: > > /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 Got it. We'll see what happens tomorrow. Thank you for all the help so far, it's been *invaluable*. Hopefully tomorrow I'll have some good news to report! btw, if this is a reproducible thing is it worth raising with enterprisedb or 2nd Quadrant? Is this a 'bug' of some kind, or just a really weird edge case? :) Regards, Martin. -- Martin Goodson "Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?" "Yes, Jamie, I believe I have." "What're you going to do?" "Bung a rock at it."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: