Alias in the HAVING clause
От | Nathan Thatcher |
---|---|
Тема | Alias in the HAVING clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d9c17fb40805131443we38ac7fj7a6c50424236161@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Alias in the HAVING clause
Re: Alias in the HAVING clause Re: Alias in the HAVING clause |
Список | pgsql-general |
I am in the middle of switching a bunch of queries over from MySQL to PostgreSQL and have hit a little snag. The following query works fine in MySQL but raises an error in postgres: SELECT COUNT(*), id % 3 AS f1 FROM table GROUP BY f1 HAVING f1 <> 0; It seems that Postgres does not recognize the alias in the HAVING clause. Rewriting it like this works in postgres: SELECT COUNT(*), id % 3 AS f1 FROM table GROUP BY f1 HAVING event_id % 3 <> 0; I am wondering if I am missing something because this looks like my expression (id % 3) is getting evaluated twice when it really only should be done once. Now, this query is obviously watered down from what I am really doing and the expression is fairly lengthy and complex so I would prefer to not have to evaluate it more times than necessary. Is this the correct way to do this, or is there a better way / a way to get PostgreSQL to recognize an alias in the HAVING clause? Thanks, Nate
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: