Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d9c1448a-f96d-7bff-5723-ac906166b0f7@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/25/2017 01:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 07/25/2017 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Oh. So when was the last time it worked? And why do the buildfarm >>> archives contain apparently-successful log_stage entries for pg_ctl-check >>> on jacana, up through yesterday when I looked? >> There was a buildfarm bug, since corrected, which was not properly >> picking up errors in a corner case. You will see the errors if you look >> at all the logs for pg_ctl-check from 12 days back if they exist. The >> last known actual good run of this test was 33 days ago, i.e. 2017-06-22 > Hm. This failure presumably started with commit f13ea95f9, which > introduced use of command_like() in the pg_ctl TAP test; but that > didn't go in until 2017-06-28. Was jacana not running in the > interim? Looks like not, possibly because one of the other machines on this box was hung (probably lorikeet). > > Anyway, if we believe that it broke with f13ea95f9, hen it's plausible > that CMD.EXE has been sharing pg_ctl's stdout/stderr all along, and we > just had not noticed before. Could you check what happens if we > change the bInheritHandles parameter as I suggested upthread? > > I'll try when I get all the animals caught up. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: