Re: [HACKERS] sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity

On 9/19/17 21:30, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
>>> Personally, I prefer "wal writer", "wal sender" and "wal receiver"
>>> that separate words as other process names.  But I don't mind leaving
>>> them as they are now.
>>
>> If we were to change those, that would break existing queries for
>> pg_stat_activity.  That's new in PG10, so we could change it if we were
>> really eager.  But it's probably not worth bothering.  Then again, there
>> is pg_stat_wal_receiver.  So it's all totally inconsistent.  Not sure
>> where to go.
> 
> OK, I'm comfortable with as it is now.
> 
> I made this ready for committer.  You can fix the following and commit the patch.  Thank you.

Committed.  Thank you.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers