Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses

On 07/01/2018 10:27 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 01:03:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Okay, I have done so in the updated set attached.  I have added some
>> documentation as well in fdwhandler.sgml about those two new things.
>> That's too late for v11 of course, so let's them sit until the time
>> comes.
> Attached are refreshed versions for this commit fest.  The deal for this
> commit fest is to not consider large patches this time, so please let me
> suggest to discard 0003 even if it is very mechanical.  I would like
> however to get 0001 and 0002 merged during this commit fest so as we can
> move on with this thread as those are simple changes, and finish 0003
> afterwards.


I think you're asserting far too broad a policy for the CF, and in any 
case there has been no discussion of what exactly is a large patch. I 
don't see any great need to defer patch 3. It is substantial although 
not what I would class as large, but it also has relatively low impact, 
ISTM.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services