Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> writes:

> Unfortunately, I was unable to get the follow-on patch to allow
> setting by relation into a shape I liked.  Let's see what we can do
> for the next release.

Okay, I'll try and crete a more comprehensive version of it for the next
commitfest.

> The first patch was applied with only very minor tweaks.

Thanks!

> I realize that nothing would break if individual users could set their
> granularity thresholds on individual connections, but as someone who
> has filled the role of DBA, the thought kinda made my skin crawl.  I
> left it as PGC_SIGHUP for now; we can talk about loosening that up
> later, but I think we should have one or more use-cases that outweigh
> the opportunities for confusion and bad choices by individual
> programmers to justify that.

I agree.  The committed version is fine for my current use case.
- ilmari

-- 
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,at any given time, on fire." - Stig Sandbeck Mathisen