Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> On 9/20/17 13:13, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> I have no opinion on the bulk of this patch set, but skimming it out of
>> curiosity I noticed that the plperl change seems to have lost the
>> dependency on plperl_helpers.h from the xsubpp targets:
>
> Those commands don't actually require plperl_helpers.h, do they?

No, but the .xs files #include it.  I guess it's SPI.o and Util.o that
should depend on the header..

- ilmari
-- 
"I use RMS as a guide in the same way that a boat captain would usea lighthouse.  It's good to know where it is, but
yougenerallydon't want to find yourself in the same spot." - Tollef Fog Heen
 


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers