Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d8d691e9-b4cb-b063-a9f1-af8d3d62cac8@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-10-27 11:53, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:35:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 2020-10-06 12:26, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I went with the name --no-instructions to have the same name for both >>> initdb and pg_upgrade. The downside is that "no-instructions" also >>> causes the scripts not to be written in pg_upgrade, which arguably is a >>> different thing. We could go with "--no-instructions" and >>> "--no-scripts", but that would leave the parameters different. I also >>> considered "--no-next-step", but that one didn't quite have the right >>> ring to me. I'm happy for other suggestions on the parameter names. >> >> What scripts are left after we remove the analyze script, as discussed in a >> different thread? > > There is still delete_old_cluster.sh. Well, that one can trivially be replaced by a printed instruction, too. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: