Re: strange behavior of pg_hba.conf file
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: strange behavior of pg_hba.conf file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d8a5560c-1363-426f-8144-fe3910ccf00c@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: strange behavior of pg_hba.conf file (Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: strange behavior of pg_hba.conf file
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/22/23 09:03, Atul Kumar wrote: > The entries that I changed were to replace the md5 with scram-sha-256 > and remove unnecessary remote IPs. FYI from: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/auth-password.html md5 The method md5 uses a custom less secure challenge-response mechanism. It prevents password sniffing and avoids storing passwords on the server in plain text but provides no protection if an attacker manages to steal the password hash from the server. Also, the MD5 hash algorithm is nowadays no longer considered secure against determined attacks. The md5 method cannot be used with the db_user_namespace feature. To ease transition from the md5 method to the newer SCRAM method, if md5 is specified as a method in pg_hba.conf but the user's password on the server is encrypted for SCRAM (see below), then SCRAM-based authentication will automatically be chosen instead. > > But it has nothing to do with connecting the server locally with "psql > -d postgres -U postgres -h localhost" The error: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "::1", user "postgres", database "postgres says it does and the error is correct as you do not have an IPv6 entry for localhost in pg_hba.conf. At least in the snippet you showed us. > > But when I try to connect it locally I get this error. So it is related When you say connect locally do you mean to localhost or to local(socket)? > to local connections only and when I pass the hostname or ip of the > server it works fine without any issue. > > > Regards. > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: