Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.
От | Jesper Pedersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d87ed9ca-f859-bc96-c896-e866716ab380@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Mithun, On 03/26/2017 01:56 AM, Mithun Cy wrote: > Thanks, Amit for the review. > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think one-dimensional patch has fewer places to touch, so that looks >> better to me. However, I think there is still hard coding and >> assumptions in code which we should try to improve. > > Great!, I will continue with spares 1-dimensional improvement. > I ran some performance scenarios on the patch to see if the increased 'spares' allocation had an impact. I havn't found any regressions in that regard. Attached patch contains some small fixes, mainly to the documentation - on top of v7. Best regards, Jesper
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: