Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
| От | Harpreet Dhaliwal |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | d86a77ef0705261031l7c6c55d2w33ab5a1a181f5cff@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
is the host base configuration methodology in postgres superior to other RDBMS.
is this something novel that postgres has come up with?
~Harpreet
is this something novel that postgres has come up with?
~Harpreet
On 5/26/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner < stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A more interesting question is what sort of hardware you need for that
>> actually to be a win, though. Loading a few tables in parallel sounds
>> like an ideal recipe for oversaturating your disk bandwidth...
> you don't actually need that much of disk bandwidth both COPY and CREATE
> INDEX are CPU bottlenecked on modern boxes and reasonable disk
> subsystems - spreading their work over multiple cores/processes can give
> big benefits.
Hmm ... I wonder if that's true for COPY BINARY ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: