Re: Abnormal Growth of Index Size - Index Size 3x large than tablesize.
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Abnormal Growth of Index Size - Index Size 3x large than tablesize. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d83346c9-86d1-f2f3-5aa2-3cb9fe99e5c8@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Abnormal Growth of Index Size - Index Size 3x large than tablesize. ("Ashish Chugh" <ashish.chugh@lavainternational.in>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/7/20 6:34 AM, Ashish Chugh wrote: > Hi Ravi, > > Thanks for your reply. One more query from our side. > > To improve performance and release index space from database, We are > running FULL Vacuum on monthly basis. As I recently learned: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1392022649.706483.1587523402642%40mail.yahoo.com To release index space index without a FULL vacuum you need to REINDEX. Look at the message above for more information. > > On PostgreSQL website it is not recommended to run FULL Vacuum on > Production Database and this also requires long downtime along with huge > log space requirement. > > What are the recommendations regarding vacuum. Can we run FULL Vacuum on > monthly basis or we should be running Online Auto Vacuum instead. > > Regards, > > Ashish > > *From:*Ravi Krishna [mailto:srkrishna1@comcast.net] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2020 9:07 PM > *To:* Ashish Chugh <ashish.chugh@lavainternational.in> > *Cc:* pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ram Pratap Maurya > <ram.maurya@lavainternational.in> > *Subject:* Re: Abnormal Growth of Index Size - Index Size 3x large than > table size. > > > > On May 6, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Ashish Chugh > <ashish.chugh@lavainternational.in > <mailto:ashish.chugh@lavainternational.in>> wrote: > > Hello Ravi, > > Total number of indexes are 10 and size is 65 GB. Shall we consider > this as a normal scenario or we need to look into the growth of the > indexes as this is increasing day by day and table data is not > increasing so drastically. Due to this performance degradation is > there and we have to run full vacuum on monthly basis. > > Table size is only 25 gb. > > Any help in this regard is appreciable. > > Indexes are stored just like tables. From storage perspective there is > no difference between a table and an index. > > So the sum of 10 different tables to 65GB, compared to 25GB of one table > sounds possible. > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: