Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
От | Drouvot, Bertrand |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d7cf51bf-2723-4fd5-9432-b124ad44c935@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 8/8/23 7:01 AM, shveta malik wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 3:17 PM Drouvot, Bertrand > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 8/4/23 1:32 PM, shveta malik wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:44 PM Drouvot, Bertrand >>> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 7/28/23 4:39 PM, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: >> > > Agreed. That is why in v10,v11 patches, we have different infra for > sync-slot worker i.e. it is not relying on "logical replication > background worker" anymore. yeah saw that, looks like the right way to go to me. >> Maybe we should start some tests/benchmark with only one sync worker to get numbers >> and start from there? > > Yes, we can do that performance testing to figure out the difference > between the two modes. I will try to get some statistics on this. > Great, thanks! Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: