Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d7ca856520a34396a43a36c574e7929b@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > 1 seconds seems a very low default for me. I can imagine that most > distributed transactions are taking longer than this to complete. One second means it is set by default to catch *all* prepared transactions. It's simply checking how long the transaction has been open via: SELECT database, ROUND(EXTRACT(epoch FROM now()-prepared)), prepared FROM pg_prepared_xacts ORDER BY prepared ASC; If you *are* using prepared transactions (which most people are not), you would want to set a specific number for your environment - and certainly more than 1 second (perhaps 5 minutes?) At that point, the check changes from "has anybody mistakenly created a prepared transaction" to "has one of our prepared transactions been open too long?" - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200905051154 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkoAYaEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgYqACgvQOPJKMpDAIdSuGIGjvqrkxO XA8AoKraljUOgV7JrFlv2dJR/T/IJ1iv =QMWI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: