Re: pgpool versus which tool?
| От | Achilleas Mantzios |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgpool versus which tool? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | d7bf0b86-bee9-f411-df26-de54c74352ad@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgpool versus which tool? (Prince Pathria <prince.pathria@goevive.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-admin |
In the case of PAM authentication (the only way to do LDAP authentication) pgbouncer is haunted by some nasty bug(s) : https://github.com/pgbouncer/pgbouncer/issues/285
I don't know if pgpool handles PAM better under stress.
On 15/10/18 1:00 μ.μ., Prince Pathria wrote:
I don't know if pgpool handles PAM better under stress.
On 15/10/18 1:00 μ.μ., Prince Pathria wrote:
Hey Pierre,go for pgBouncer if you want transaction based pooling and if your sole aim to use pgPool is for pooling then better go for pgBouncer.pgBouncer performs 3x better than pgpool-II in benchmarking results.On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:Pierre Ochsenbein schrieb am 15.10.2018 um 09:38:
> Which best of tool you recommend to replace pgpool?
What's wrong with pgPool that you think you need to replace it?
And what is you requirement for such a tool?
-- Achilleas Mantzios IT DEV Lead IT DEPT Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: