[HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d71e3fb4-6413-5f09-b62c-98e7bef477e8@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?
Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs? Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, I am a bad speaker, I am writing a talk three weeks before the conference (as opposed to on the plane). I noticed in the docs we still reference the passing of SIGHUP for reloading conf file but we now have pg_reload_conf(); It seems the use of pg_reload_conf() would provide a better canonical interface to our users. Especially those users who are not used to interacting with the OS (Windows, Oracle etc...) for databases. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: