Re: TRIM_ARRAY
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TRIM_ARRAY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d6429c8e-1811-6456-b3f2-20ca5776076b@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TRIM_ARRAY (Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TRIM_ARRAY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/16/21 7:32 PM, Isaac Morland wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 12:54, Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> wrote: > >> The SQL standard defines a function called TRIM_ARRAY that surprisingly >> has syntax that looks like a function! So I implemented it using a thin >> wrapper around our array slice syntax. It is literally just ($1)[1:$2]. >> >> An interesting case that I decided to handle by explaining it in the >> docs is that this won't give you the first n elements if your lower >> bound is not 1. My justification for this is 1) non-standard lower >> bounds are so rare in the wild that 2) people using them can just not >> use this function. The alternative is to go through the unnest dance >> (or write it in C) which defeats inlining. >> > > I don't recall ever seeing non-default lower bounds, so I actually think > it's OK to just rule out that scenario, but why not something like this: > > ($1)[:array_lower ($1, 1) + $2 - 1] I'm kind of embarrassed that I didn't think about doing that; it is a much better solution. You lose the non-standard bounds but I don't think there is any way besides C to keep the lower bound regardless of how you trim it. V2 attached. -- Vik Fearing
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: