Re: do I need replication or something else?
От | John Burger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do I need replication or something else? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d629a43f8794ea3483ec473e9db64745@mitre.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do I need replication or something else? ("Guy Rouillier" <guyr@masergy.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: do I need replication or something else?
Re: do I need replication or something else? Re: do I need replication or something else? |
Список | pgsql-general |
>> If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication >> was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken. > > I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way > replication > indicates a broken design. I agree with your disagreement. This design is present in lots of non-RDB systems - CVS, IMAP, PDA syncing, etc. It's clearly more complicated, but can be made to work, and has been many times. I don't see anything about databases in general, or Postgres specifically, that indicates it's a bad idea. - John D. Burger MITRE
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: