Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR:unsupported type
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR:unsupported type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d526eb53-dbd6-d414-8e5d-21e644ce4549@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR: unsupported type (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR: unsupported type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
OK, time to revive this old thread ... On 09/23/2017 05:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>> [ scalarineqsel may fall over when used by extension operators ] > >> What about using two-pronged approach: > >> 1) fall back to mid bucket in back branches (9.3 - 10) >> 2) do something smarter (along the lines you outlined) in PG11 > > Sure. We need to test the fallback case anyway. > Attached is a minimal fix adding a flag to convert_numeric_to_scalar, tracking when it fails because of unsupported data type. If any of the 3 calls (value + lo/hi boundaries) sets it to 'true' we simply fall back to the default estimate (0.5) within the bucket. >>> [ sketch of a more extensible design ] > >> Sounds reasonable to me, I guess - I can't really think about anything >> simpler giving us the same flexibility. > > Actually, on further thought, that's still too simple. If you look > at convert_string_to_scalar() you'll see it's examining all three > values concurrently (the probe value, of one datatype, and two bin > boundary values of possibly a different type). The reason is that > it's stripping off whatever common prefix those strings have before > trying to form a numeric equivalent. While certainly > convert_string_to_scalar is pretty stupid in the face of non-ASCII > sort orders, the prefix-stripping is something I really don't want > to give up. So the design I sketched of considering each value > totally independently isn't good enough. > > We could, perhaps, provide an API that lets an operator estimation > function replace convert_to_scalar in toto, but that seems like > you'd still end up duplicating code in many cases. Not sure about > how to find a happy medium. > I plan to work on this improvement next, once I polish a couple of other patches for the upcoming commit fest. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: