Re: Not ready for 8.3
От | Nathan Buchanan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d51c18ed0705151842k17bb22ads21073e997b8a09d2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not ready for 8.3 (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/15/07, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
This sounds like a good idea to me - though I'm just a lurker on the list.
Nathan
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >> They are not stable. The items should point to the archives, which are
> >> supposedly more stable. (I had already fixed one item in PatchStatus
> >> this morning). Really it would be much nicer to have links using the
> >> Message-Id but I doubt that's at all doable.
> >
> > hrm - I see so is there a particular reason for that behaviour ?
>
> They're stable until Bruce removes something from the queue. When
> something is removed, it's renumbered.
>
> It's how mhonarc works. It's the same with the archives - if we delete a
> mail, they get renumbered. So we never should delete, we should just
> blank out, but it has happened a couple of times.
As I proposed for many times, why don't we add message number to each
subject line in mail? For example like this:
[HACKERS: 12345] Re: Not ready for 8.3
This way, we could always obtain stable (logical) pointer, without
reling on particular archival infrastructure.
This sounds like a good idea to me - though I'm just a lurker on the list.
Nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: