Re: Force re-compression with lz4
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Force re-compression with lz4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d4ff3c0b-ac43-6b00-622a-501870fc2810@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Force re-compression with lz4 (Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Force re-compression with lz4
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/18/21 01:07, Michael Paquier wrote: > CPU-speaking, LZ4 is*much* faster than pglz when it comes to > compression or decompression with its default options. The > compression ratio is comparable between both, still LZ4 compresses in > average less than PGLZ. > -- > Michael LZ4 works much better with deduplication tools like Data Domain or Data Domain Boost (client side deduplication). With zip or gzip compression, deduplication ratios are much lower than with LZ4. Most of the modern backup tools (DD, Veeam, Rubrik, Commvault) support deduplication. LZ4 algorithm uses less CPU than zip, gzip or bzip2 and works much better with deduplication algorithms employed by the backup tools. This is actually a very big and positive change. Disclosure: I used to work for Commvault as a senior PS engineer. Commvault was the first tool on the market to combine LZ4 and deduplication. Regards -- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 https://dbwhisperer.wordpress.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: