Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d4cvmv$1shj$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Looked on AMD's website. 132 for 4x875 on Windows, 126 on Linux. (Probably Intel compiler on Windows, gcc on Linux.) That gets AMD into the $100K 16+ processor Sun system area in terms of performance. Of course, Sun still has a crapload of other uptime/reliability features built-in to their systems. William Yu wrote: > The numbers don't have the latest dual core Opterons yet. (Don't see > them on spec.org yet either.) My random guess right now, 4x2 system > would probably be about 140 SpecINT_rate. It's looking like it's faster > than have a DC Opteron w/ 1 memory bank versus Dual Opteron w/ 2 memory > bank because the interconnect between cores inside a DC CPU is so much > faster than the HT motherboard connect.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: