Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d4992e93-054c-b2e1-a627-827bba92050e@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL (Paul Hughes <paul@vivation.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Python versus Other Languages using PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/09/2017 01:00 PM, Paul Hughes wrote: > Thank you all for taking the time to answer my questions. I've been out > of the programming world for a long time, so I am back to being a > newbie. I was told this is the place for newcomers to ask questions. I > apologize if my questions did not contain the necessary sophistication > or nuance for some to answer. It has more to do with making unsubstantiated assertions, namely: "I noticed that most of the largest web platforms that use PostgreSQL as their primary database, also use Python as their primary back-end language. ..." Many on this list(myself included) will want to know how you came to that conclusion and I am speaking as someone who uses Python, Django and Postgres. > > George, your answer makes the most sense. Thank you! You said: > >>>Most cloud servers come preconfigured with some variation of either > the "LAMP" or "LAPP" stack: i.e. Linux, Apache, MySQL or Postgresql, > PHP or Python. > >>>There needs to be a compelling *application* reason to install > something else: a JVM (or Apache-Tomcat vs regular Apache), > Ruby/Rails, Groovy/Grails, etc. > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: