Re: PGCOLOR? (Re: pgsql: Unified logging system for command-lineprograms)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGCOLOR? (Re: pgsql: Unified logging system for command-lineprograms) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d483cdb6-db98-9b2f-7f2b-eed0f4bd975d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PGCOLOR? (Re: pgsql: Unified logging system for command-lineprograms) (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGCOLOR? (Re: pgsql: Unified logging system for command-lineprograms)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-04-09 11:22, Christoph Berg wrote: > Can we rename PG_COLOR to PGCOLOR? This is the only PG* environment > variable prefixed with the extra underscore, and remembering that will > be confusing. (Like pgbench should really be named pg_bench for > consistency.) Even if it's not a libpq variable, but that's an > implementation detail that users shouldn't have to worry about. I'm okay with changing it. As you indicate, I chose the name so that it doesn't look like a libpq variable. There are some other PG_ variables throughout the code, but those appear to be mostly for internal use. Also, there is GCC_COLORS, LS_COLORS, etc. But perhaps this wisdom will be lost on users who just read the man page and get confused. ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: