Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d439a7aa-7735-7ed9-8119-3b159a5d7741@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 4/5/19 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:14 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se > <mailto:daniel@yesql.se>> wrote: > > Reading the pg_upgrade reference page, I get the feeling that one of the > bullets under "Reverting to old cluster" is a bit thin on detail to > be helpful > to newcomers: > > "If you ran pg_upgrade with --link, the data files are shared > between the > old and new cluster. If you started the new cluster, the new > server has > written to those shared files and it is unsafe to use the old > cluster." > > This is perfectly correct, but it fails to provide information on > what to do > next in case reverting is in fact what the user wants. The attached > patch adds > a short sentence saying the old cluster should be restored from > backups at this > point. > > > Let's have two non-english natives discuss it :), but wouldn't it sound > better with "in this case" than "at this point"? And as a really small > nitpick, restore from backup, rather than backups? I would go with: "If you need to restore the old cluster, you will have to do so using backups that you took prior to the upgrade." Or if you want to be overly verbose: "If you need to restore the old cluster, you will have to do so using backups that you made prior to the upgrade as the --link does not create a copy of the old cluster files." Jonathan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: