Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d4052199-0f74-da33-9b5e-2250aea05edd@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Correct the documentation for work_mem ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.04.23 16:28, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote: > I recently noticed the following in the work_mem [1] documentation: > > “Note that for a complex query, several sort or hash operations might be > running in parallel;” > > The use of “parallel” here is misleading as this has nothing to do with > parallel query, but > > rather several operations in a plan running simultaneously. > > The use of parallel in this doc predates parallel query support, which > explains the usage. > > I suggest a small doc fix: > > “Note that for a complex query, several sort or hash operations might be > running simultaneously;” Here is a discussion of these terms: https://takuti.me/note/parallel-vs-concurrent/ I think "concurrently" is the correct word here.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: