Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d3c15820-562c-dcc4-5d4f-74550547e029@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 11/9/18 10:30 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2018-11-09 21:45:18 -0500, David Steele wrote: >> On 10/5/18 1:03 PM, David Steele wrote: >>> >>> So, while the WAL segment size used to be expressed in terms of 8K pages >>> it is now expressed in terms of absolute bytes. This seemed to me to be >>> a very deliberate change in the original commit so I guessed it was done >>> for clarity, but that the docs didn't get the message. >> >> Thoughts on this? >> >> I know it's minor in the grand scheme of things but it caused me some >> confusion when I was updating pgBackRest for v11 and I imagine it might >> do the same for others. > > Sorry for forgetting this, pushed. No worries. Thanks for pushing it. > I kinda wonder whether we should move a few GUCs out of the > <sect1 id="runtime-config-preset"> > section. Or adapt its description. Because a significant portion of its > contents don't accurately seem to be described by > The following <quote>parameters</quote> are read-only, and are determined > when <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> is compiled or when it is > installed. > right? I agree that "installed" is a bit vague. Most of them are set at compile-time, some are set at initdb, and a few are set at CREATE DATABASE. I'm not sure about moving any out since it seems like "presets" fits the bill. Maybe just break it up into three sections? -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: