Re: Replication
| От | Scott Mead |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | d3ab2ec80906232000q28b67348w49347cd901c1953@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Replication (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
Thomas Kellerer wrote:Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
> Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
>> Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others still
>> replicate amongst themselves?)
>
> I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
Shared-
Storage
Memory
Listener
Storage : Obvious
Memory: Cache fusion maintains buffer consistency across the network
Listener: Load balancing and failover of connections are handled transparently by TNS (transparent network substrate).
--Scott
--
Craig Ringer
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: