Re: popcount
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: popcount |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d33d668b-bf70-126d-9ca3-ad5a50488091@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: popcount (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: popcount
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-01-18 16:34, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> [ assorted nits ] > > At the level of bikeshedding ... I quite dislike using the name "popcount" > for these functions. I'm aware that some C compilers provide primitives > of that name, but I wouldn't expect a SQL programmer to know that; > without that context the name seems pretty random and unintuitive. > Moreover, it invites confusion with SQL's use of "pop" to abbreviate > "population" in the statistical aggregates, such as var_pop(). I was thinking about that too, but according to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_weight>, popcount is an accepted high-level term, with "pop" also standing for "population".
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: