Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer
От | Tomas Pospisek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d2b32aa1-72d7-42aa-81c0-651aa23d72c3@sourcepole.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 10.10.23 22:51, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:55:43AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 07:09:02PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 08:36:53PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >>>>> When the server is on a non-Windows platform then the server must use GSSAPI >>>>> if it wants to authenticate the client either via Kerberos or via Active >>>>> Directory. A client on a Windows platform that connects to a non-Windows >>>>> Postgresql server can either use SSPI (strongly encouraged) or GSS (much >>>>> more difficult to set up) if it wants to authenticate via Kerberos or Active >>>>> Directory. A client from a non-Windows platform must use GSS if it wants to >>>>> authenticate via Kerberos or Active Directory." >>>> >>>> Rather than work in negative, I feel like it might make more sense to >>>> work in positives? That is, perhaps this instead: >>>> >>>> On Windows platforms, SSPI is the default and most commonly used >>>> mechanism. Note that an SSPI client can authenticate to a server which >>>> is using either SSPI or GSSAPI, and a GSSAPI client can authenticate to >>>> a server which is using either SSPI or GSSAPI. Generally speaking, >>>> clients and servers on Windows are recommended to use SSPI while clients >>>> and servers on Unix (non-Windows) platforms use GSSAPI. >>> >>> I developed the attached patch. >> >> My first attempt was too terse, so here is a more detailed version, >> attached. > > Patch applied back to PG 11. Nice! Thanks a lot Bruce! And: Stephen wrote: > >> Tomas wrote: >> >> - anybody here that has the guts, time and willingness to take the >> supposed improvement and apply put it into the git repo? > > This isn't helpful and frankly is detrimental to getting this change > included. We strive strongly to have a positive tone and focus on > technical excellence. Thanks a lot Stephen for this comment! I hope it will cause a more important change on my side than my minuscule effort to improve the docu. And sorry I didn't follow up - life piled up and I never came back to this. Many thanks Stephen, really, very appreciated and thanks Bruce for picking up the ball!!! *t
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: