Re: [HACKERS] shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d239da75-68de-72b6-f424-1a98578c7f88@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/23/17 11:15, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> For clarity, I personally perfer to keep all the source text file >> in the repository, especially so that we can detect changes of >> them. But since we decide that at least most of them not to be >> there (from a reason of license), I just don't see a reason to >> keep only the rest even without the restriction. > > So are you saying that if n/m of authority files are not kept because > of license issue, then m-n authority files should not be kept as well? > What's the benefit for us by doing so? I don't have a clear opinion on this particular issue, but I think we should have clarity on why particular files or code exist. So why do these files exist and the others don't? Is it just the license? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: