Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d1f28eb6-f8b5-387e-39e5-1cc3e3092974@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags ("Seki, Eiji" <seki.eiji@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/14/17 3:13 AM, Seki, Eiji wrote: > +extern TransactionId GetOldestXmin(Relation rel, uint8 ignoreFlags); My impression is that most other places that do this sort of thing just call the argument 'flags', so as not to "lock in" a single idea of what the flags are for. I can't readily think of another use for flags in GetOldestXmin, but ISTM it's better to just go with "flags" instead of "ignoreFlags". -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: