Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d1423ecb-4d3f-3c82-207d-1c254f187f52@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/28/23 05:53, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-01-27 23:18:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I also saw it on florican, which is/was an i386 machine using clang and >> pretty standard build options other than >> 'CFLAGS' => '-msse2 -O2', >> so I think this isn't too much about machine architecture or compiler >> flags. > > Ah. Florican dropped of the BF status page and I was too lazy to look > deeper. You have a penchant for odd architectures, so it didn't seem too crazy > :) > > >> Machine speed might matter though. elver is a good deal faster than >> florican was, and dikkop is slower yet. I gather Thomas has seen this >> only once on elver, but I saw it maybe a dozen times over a couple of >> years on florican, and now dikkop has hit it after not so many runs. > > Re-reading the old thread, it is interesting that you tried hard to reproduce > it outside of the BF, without success: > https://postgr.es/m/2398828.1646000688%40sss.pgh.pa.us > > Such problems are quite annoying. Last time I hit such a case was > https://postgr.es/m/20220325052654.3xpbmntatyofau2w%40alap3.anarazel.de > but I can't see anything like that being the issue here. > FWIW I'll wait for dikkop to finish the current buildfarm run (it's currently chewing on HEAD) and then will try to do runs of the 'joins' test in a loop. That's where dikkop got stuck before. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: