Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings
От | Tomisław Kityński |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d0f46297-56e6-cf73-8b59-a7b23d675670@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
W dniu 30.01.2023 o 21:39, Bruce Momjian pisze:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:19:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-createrole.html Description: From time to time some spelling for given command gets obsolete, yet it is shown in the syntax on "equal rights" as other valid clauses. For instance see `CREATE ROLE` with deprecated spellings like `IN GROUP` or `USER`. I guess it would be useful to see those spellings visually marked as deprecated in Synopsis section (with e.g. strike-through or whatever suits better). Otherwise, when consulting documentation, it often requires jumping from the synopsis to detailed description and back to check if given spelling is still applicable. Just a thought. :-)We don't need to show all _supported_ syntaxes in the "Synopsis" section, so we could just remove them.
I like this idea even more! :-) Much cleaner approach . And then those obsolete aliases could be simply mentioned in the text for backward compatibility. Big yes! :-)
--
Greetings, TK
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: