Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d0c358963653f080762b6b62b9d4d7e2d33b38ab.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 18:27 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Today I tested icu for Czech sorting. It is a little bit slower, but > not too much, but it produces partially different results. Thank you for trying it. If it's a significant slowdown, can you please send more information? ICU version, libc version, and testcase? > select row_number() over (order by nazev collate "cs-x-icu"), nazev > from obce > except select row_number() over (order by nazev collate "cs_CZ"), > nazev from obce; > > returns a not empty set. So minimally for Czech collate, an index > rebuild is necessary Yes, that's true of any locale change, provider change, or even provider version change. -- Jeff Davis PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: