Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d0097e39-b4fb-effd-5701-dcbe4f2353df@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/15/21 2:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:20 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hmm, could be. Although, the stack trace at issue doesn't seem to show >>> a call to create_incrementalsort_plan(). >> >> The changes to gather merge path generation made it possible to use >> those paths in more cases for both incremental sort and regular sort, >> so by "incremental sort" I read Tomas as saying "the patches that >> brought in incremental sort" not specifically "incremental sort >> itself". > > I agree. That's why I said "hmm, could be" even though the plan > doesn't involve one. > Yeah, that's what I meant. The difference to pre-13 behavior is that we now call generate_useful_gather_paths, which also considers adding extra sort (unlike plain generate_gather_paths). So now we can end up with "Gather Merge -> Sort" paths that would not be considered before. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: