Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | crc87h$2ehh$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Dave Cramer wrote: > > > William Yu wrote: > >> amrit@health2.moph.go.th wrote: >> >>> I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb]. >> >> >> >> 1536 is probaby too low. I've tested a bunch of different settings on >> my 8GB Opteron server and 10K seems to be the best setting. > > > Be careful here, he is not using opterons which can access physical > memory above 4G efficiently. Also he only has 4G the 6-10% rule still > applies 10% of 4GB is 400MB. 10K buffers is 80MB. Easily less than the 6-10% rule. >> To figure out your effective cache size, run top and add free+cached. > > > My understanding is that effective cache is the sum of shared buffers, > plus kernel buffers, not sure what free + cached gives you? Not true. Effective cache size is the free memory available that the OS can use for caching for Postgres. In a system that runs nothing but Postgres, it's free + cached.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: