Re: TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5
От | Rosny |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cp3nqc$27fl$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5 ("Rosny" <sehatrosny@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Thanks for the response. I just start to get a feel of where TableSpace will be used. You are right I do not have 7000 logical filesystems. I am assuming using TableSpace as organization of files in folders in Windows 2003 Environment. So, each TableSpace will represent one folder(directory) in a drive. But this doesnot work to well for my design. Since pgAdmin III GUI take 2 hours just to load approximately 14000 tables. I am not using TableSpace approach anymore. I am using multiple database approach. Anyway, thanks for the response. Today testing by taking several option to the limit. I kind of having some ideas for future scability. Rosny "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in message news:10164.1102394676@sss.pgh.pa.us... > "Rosny" <sehatrosny@hotmail.com> writes: > > B. For each department create tablespace. (Which means, if there > > are 7000 departments, there will be 7000 tablespace each contains > > 20 tables). > > If your system has seven thousand separate logical filesystems attached > to it, there might be some value in having seven thousand tablespaces. > But I will bet a great deal that it does not and there isn't. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: