Re: Inserts optimization?
От | Francisco Reyes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserts optimization? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cone.1145107606.91317.47312.1000@zoraida.natserv.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inserts optimization? (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Gábriel Ákos writes: > you are right. raid5 is definitely not suitable for database activities. That is not entirely true. :-) Right now the new server is not ready and the ONLY place I could put the DB for Bacula was a machine with RAID 5. So far it is holding fine. HOWEVER... only one bacula job at a time so far and the machine doesn't do anything else. :-) > it is good for file servers, though. Even for a DB server, from what I have read and what I have experienced so far for mostly read DBs RAID5 should be ok. Specially if you have enough memory. As I add more clients to Bacula and the jobs bump into each other I will better know how the DB holds up. I am doing each FULL backup at a time so hopefully by the time I do multiple backups from multiple machines less records will need to be inserted to the DB and there will be a more balanced operation between reads and writes. Right now there are lots of inserts going on.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: