Re: Inserts optimization?
От | Francisco Reyes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserts optimization? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cone.1145014225.784898.23930.1000@zoraida.natserv.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inserts optimization? (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserts optimization?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby writes: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:59:23PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: >> In RAID 10 would it matter that WALL is in the same RAID set? >> Would it be better: >> 4 disks in RAID10 Data >> 2 disks RAID 1 WALL >> 2 hot spares > > Well, benchmark it with your app and find out, but generally speaking > unless your database is mostly read you'll see a pretty big benefit to > seperating WAL from table/index data. That will not be easy to compare.. it would mean setting up the machine.. trashing it.. then redoing the whole setup.. I am leaning towards using pgbench against the current machine to see what parameters affect inserts.. perhaps also doing dome tests with just inserts from a file. Then using the same setups on the next machine and just go with RAID10 on the 6 disks. Split the raid into 10 may give me space issues to deal with. Will also find out if the app, Bacula, batches transactions or not.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: