Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cn9n5k$chf$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Greg Stark wrote: > William Yu <wyu@talisys.com> writes: > > >>Biggest speedup I've found yet is the backup process (PG_DUMP --> GZIP). 100% >>faster in 64-bit mode. This drastic speed might be more the result of 64-bit >>GZIP though as I've seen benchmarks in the past showing encryption/compression >>running 2 or 3 times faster in 64-bit mode versus 32-bit. > > > Isn't this a major kernel bump too? So a different scheduler, different IO > scheduler, etc? > I'm sure there's some speedup due to the kernel bump. I really didn't have the patience to even burn the FC2 32-bit CDs much less install both 32-bit & 64-bit FC2 in order to have a more accurate baseline comparison. However, that being said -- when you see huge speed increases like 50% 100% for dump+gzip, it's doubtful the kernel/process scheduler/IO scheduler could have made that drastic of a difference. Maybe somebody else who has done a 2.4 -> 2.6 upgrade can give us a baseline to subtract from my numbers.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: