Re: creating audit tables
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: creating audit tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ckp99j$1cck$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: creating audit tables (Scott Cain <cain@cshl.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Have you thought about unifying the audit + the current table and add from/to datestamps for every record? Example: from_dt to_dt value 9/1/2004 9/30/2004 ABC 9/30/2004 10/5/2004 XYZ 10/6/2004 12/31/9999 123 This would let you use the following query on the same table whether you wanted historic values or current values. SELECT * FROM table WHERE from_dt >= as_of_date AND to_dt <= as_of_date Scott Cain wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I created one audit table for each table in the database just because > that seemed to me to be the sensible thing to do. The reason we want > audit tables is so that we can ask the question: "what was the state of > the database 6 months ago" and the easiest way to answer that question > is with shadow tables where I can write the same queries I do now, just > changing (slightly) the table name and adding a date check to the where > clause. Using a big, unified table makes it much harder to ask that > sort of question, unless you spend a fair amount of effort making views > to simulate the real audit tables I already have. I don't see any > advantage to us in using a unified table. > > Scott
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: