Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Дата
Msg-id cfcb0c3a59c57e77063c259b0d4295ff0923c64e.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 12:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> If nobody's too unhappy with the idea, I plan to commit this soon,
> both because I think that the feature is useful, and also because I
> think it's an important security improvement.

Is there any chance I can convince you to separate the privileges of
using a connection string and creating a subscription, as I
suggested[1] earlier?

It would be useful for dblink, and I also plan to propose CREATE
SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER for v17 (it was too late for 16), for which it
would also be useful to make the distinction.

You seemed to generally think it was a reasonable idea, but wanted to
wait for the other patch. I think it's the right breakdown of
privileges even now, and I don't see a reason to give ourselves a
headache later trying to split up the privileges later.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fa1190c117c2455f2dd968a1a09f796ccef27b29.camel@j-davis.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can we avoid chdir'ing in resolve_symlinks() ?
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb