Re: Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cfc37f2f-79f4-6688-d3b8-613adccb4964@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/05/2016 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> Windows XP has been past end of life for quite some time. Nevertheless I >> have kept my instance running with three buildfarm members: frogmouth, >> currawong and brolga. Howeever, a recent commit (apparently fa2fa99, but >> I'm not 100% sure) started causing a compiler segmentation fault on >> frogmouth, the mingw/gcc-4.5.0 animal running on this machine. >> ... >> Does anyone have any strong opinion in favor of keeping any of these >> animals running? > Hm, a look through our commit logs finds multiple mentions of each of > these animals as having been the only one showing a particular portability > issue. So I'm worried about loss of portability coverage. Are you sure > that the animals' build options and choices of toolchains are replicated > elsewhere? > > Not exactly the same, no. e.g. jacana is similar but it doesn't build with python, tcl or openssl, and does build with nls, it's 64bit vs 32bit, and it runs a more modern compiler on a more modern OS. If you think it's worth it I will put some effort into fixing frogmouth. I can certainly keep the others running for a while with little difficulty. I will disable frogmouth until I get a chance to look for a fix - next week at the earliest. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: